Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts

Balance - the cornerstone of journalism

Balance; a tricky thing in modern life. How can you spin all of those plates without letting them crash to the floor?

It should not, however, be a tricky thing for journalists. Balance is the foundation upon which our objectivity is based, and omitting it from our work undermines what we do and is a leading reason we are perceived as so untrustworthy in society.

Two stories have failed to demonstrate this today. They are very different and have diverse audiences, but fundamentally failed to provide contextual information to help readers and listeners make informed judgement.

The first came on Radio 4’s Today programme this morning when GQ editor Dylan Jones was brought in to discuss the cover photograph of Jeremy Corbyn. What he did was take the opportunity to lambast the Labour leader for being demanding, weak, and, in essence, a fraud.

That is entirely Jones’s right. However, what Today failed to do was contextualise his comments. Dylan Jones is a vocal supporter of the Conservative Party and his criticism of Corbyn must be placed within that context.

GQ’s coverage has been so Tory-focussed in the past decade that, when presenting an award at the magazines’ Men of the Year, Noel Gallagher quipped: “Welcome to the Tory Party conference”.



Jones denies this and claims that the awards just mirror public opinion.

The second came in a completely difference setting when the BBC Sport website reported that 1966 World Cup winner Gordon Banks was offering significant criticism of current ‘keeper Joe Hart.

No problem there. Banks is a legend, Hart has been having significant difficulties in the past three years, and people are entitled to their opinions.

The lack of balance came when Banks went on to sing the praises of Jack Butland. Again, he is entitled to do so but the reporter, when writing the story, needs to find time to point out that Banks is a Stoke legend – who actually wore a Stoke City tie to the World Cup draw today – and Butland is the current Stoke keeper.


It’s a small thing in the grand scheme of it but balance begins with providing contextual information. We’re not making readers’ minds up, we’re providing fair and objective reporting.

My colleagues and I plead for balance in our students' work but how will our pleas be heard if they are not seeing it in much of the industry?

Am I coming out as a Tory?

I like telly - it's been the subject of previous blogs. I particularly like sci-fi/fantasy style TV shows in the ilk of BSG, Lost, Harper's Island etc etc. I also have no objection to TV programmes showing the seedier side of life and people making the beast with two backs.
So it seemed only natural to get into True Blood - a series about vampires starring the extremely attractive young lady who played Rogue in the X-Men.

But when I watch it I feel a curious sensation. Is this just too seedy for me?
There is a huge quantity of nooky - most of it rough - but that's ok.
But then there's the misogyny. Women seem to be little more than objects. Not objects of desire even, or even a mark on the bedpost, just something to do - literally most of the time.
I am watching it with unease and sense of moral outrage and it hits me. I am old. I have two children and it has changed my view on life completely.
That the women gain some vengeance by the end and assert their independence meant little to me - I was on a moral crusade by the end.
I am worried I might be coming a Conservative (yes that's right - with a capital C)Worst feeling ever.

Oh Dear George




http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/oct/09/george-osborne-budget-deficit

Let me get this right. We're in a recession, you're planning our way out and yet think that a £3bn error in a £13bn prediction is "presentational". My maths may not be amazing - similar to yours - but I would say that you were about 23 per cent out there.

I'm not confident. Come on Green Party make a bloody effort.